A list for people interested in developing the OVAL language.
View all threadsRE: the UNIX xinetd test.
It appears some linux variants recently have a new 'type' for their services. Current OVAL schema allow for xinetd state and item 'types' of:
Later versions of openSUSE and maybe others also report a type of 'INTERNAL UNLISTED.'
Suggest we add 'INTERNAL UNLISTED' to list of valid 'type' values for xinetd state and item.
John R. Ulmer
SPAWAR Systems Center Atlantic
john.r.ulmer6.civ@mail.mil
843.218.5953
Hi John,
The 5.11.2 schema allows multiple (unbounded) xinetd_item/type entities, meaning that enumerating both INTERNAL and UNLISTED types for an xinetd service is currently possible. I believe that’s how this situation is intended to be handled.
IIRC, this was discussed… somewhere (perhaps on this very list?)
Best regards,
—David Solin
David A. Solin
Co-Founder, Research & Technology
solin@jovalcm.com mailto:solin@jovalcm.com
https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/X8d4B3Ia1kwHz?domain=jovalcm.com
https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/7GXMBYfGE4WFM?domain=facebook.com https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/EJReB8u048QUX?domain=linkedin.com
On Oct 24, 2017, at 2:05 PM, Ulmer, John R CIV USN SPAWARSYSCEN LANT SC (US) john.r.ulmer6.civ@mail.mil wrote:
RE: the UNIX xinetd test.
It appears some linux variants recently have a new 'type' for their services. Current OVAL schema allow for xinetd state and item 'types' of:
Later versions of openSUSE and maybe others also report a type of 'INTERNAL UNLISTED.'
Suggest we add 'INTERNAL UNLISTED' to list of valid 'type' values for xinetd state and item.
John R. Ulmer
SPAWAR Systems Center Atlantic
john.r.ulmer6.civ@mail.mil
843.218.5953
OVAL_Developer mailing list
OVAL_Developer@lists.cisecurity.org
http://lists.cisecurity.org/mailman/listinfo/oval_developer_lists.cisecurity.org